Brower, Charles N.

This page provides data on individual adjudicative policy of the arbitrator.

Case (comments) Appointed by Award (without costs & interests) Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
PV Investors v ES, PCA 2012-14.
COMMENT:
  • Reasonable return subsidized by the State.
 Claimant €91,100,000 Yes No
Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v. The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 34877.
RELATED COMMENT:
 Claimant $96,355,369.17 No No
Perenco Ecuador Ltd. v. Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), ICSID Case No. ARB/08/6.
COMMENT:
 Claimant $394,380,883 No Yes, succeeded due to an interview he gave during the proceedings.
OAO Tatneft v. Ukraine, PCA Case No. 2008-8. Claimant $112,000,000 No No
Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited v. Independent Power Tanzania Limited, ICSID Case No. ARB/98/8 Claimant $11,583,000. No No
Vacuum Salt Products Ltd. v. Ghana, ICSID Case No. ARB/92/1. Claimant No jurisdiction No No
Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d. v. Slovenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/24. Claimant €19,987,000 No No
Ali Allawi v. Pakistan, PCA Case NO. 2012-23 Claimant In favor of State No No
LSF-KEB Holdings SCA and others v. Korea, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/37. Claimant NA No No
Maxim Naumchenko, Andrey Poluektov and Tenoch Holdings Limited v. India, PCA Case No. 2013-23. Claimant In favor of State No No
Agility for Public Warehousing Company K.S.C. v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/8. Claimant Breach, but no damages. No No
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Europe v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/13. Claimant $ 34,400,000 Yes No
Mesa Power Group, LLC v. Canada, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-17 Claimants In favor of State Yes No
Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1. Claimants No jurisdiction Yes No
Case (comments) Appointed by Award (without costs & interests) Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
White Industries Australia Limited v. The Republic of India, UNCITRAL. Claimant AU$4,085,180 No No
Vannessa Ventures Ltd. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)04/6 Claimant In favor of State No No
Telefónica S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/20 Claimant NA No No
Adel A Hamadi Al Tamimi v. Sultanate of Oman, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/33. Claimant In favor of State No No
Siemens A.G. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8. Claimant $237,838,439 No No
Renta 4 S.V.S.A, Ahorro Corporación Emergentes F.I., Ahorro Corporación Eurofondo F.I., Rovime Inversiones SICAV S.A., Quasar de Valors SICAV S.A., Orgor de Valores SICAV S.A., GBI 9000 SICAV S.A. (Yukos) v. Russian Federation, SCC No. 24/2007. Claimant $2,026,480 Separate opinion No
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case No. UN3467. Claimant $75,074,929 No No
Impregilo S.p.A. v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/17. Claimant $21,294,000 No No
Hochtief AG v Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31. Claimant $13,410,000 No No
HICEE B.V. v. The Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2009-11. Claimant No jurisdiction Yes No
Piero Foresti, Laura de Carli & Others v. The Republic of South Africa, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/01. Claimant In favor of State No No
Ethyl Corporation v. Canada, UNCITRAL. Claimant No jurisdiction No No
Azpetrol International Holdings B.V., Azpetrol Group B.V. and Azpetrol Oil Services Group B.V. v. The Republic of Azerbaijan, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/15. Claimants No jurisdiction No No
Austrian Airlines v. The Slovak Republic, UNCITRAL. Claimants No jurisdiction Separate opinion. No
Case (comments) Appointed by Award (without costs & interests) Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
ADC & ADMC Management Limited v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/16. Claimant $83,823,693 No No
Interbrew Central European Holding B.V. v. Republic of Slovenia, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/17 Claimant Settlement No No