Alexandrov, Stanimir A.

This page provides data on individual adjudicative policy of the arbitrator. Dr Alexandrov was a partner at SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP.

Case (comments) Appointed by Award Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula, S.C. European Food S.A, S.C. Starmill S.R.L. and S.C. Multipack S.R.L. v. Romania [I], ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20.
COMMENTS:
Claimants. RON 376,433,229 = € 77,049,592.19 No. No.
Georg Gavrilović & Gavrilović D.O.O. v CROATIA, ICSID Case No ARB/12/39.
COMMENT:
Claimants. HRK 9,699,463.73 (€ 1,274,236.01) and € 1,658,960.49 No. No.
A11Y Ltd v Czech Republic, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/1.
COMMENT:
Claimants. In favor of the Government. No. No.
Magyar Farming Company Ltd, Kintyre Kft, Inícia Zrt v Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/27.
COMMENTS:
Claimants. € 7,148,824 No. No.
Raiffeisen Bank International AG and Raiffeisenbank Austria d.d. v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/34. Claimants. Pending. No. Yes, but unsuccessful.
Nations Energy Corporation, Electric Machinery Enterprises Inc., and Jamie Jurado v. Panama, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/19. Chairman of the ICSID Administrative Council. NA No. Yes, by the claimants, but unsuccessful.
World Wide Minerals v. Republic of Kazakhstan, UNCITRAL (Case 1). Both parties No jurisdiction, time-bar. No. No.
Alpha Projektholding GmbH v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/16. Government. $ 5,250,782 at 9.11 % interest. No. No.
Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GmbH and Others v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/8. Proposed by Claimants, and accepted by the Government. Won by claimants. Amounts are confidential. No. No.
International Company for Railway Systems (ICRS) v. Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/13. NA Discontinuance No. No.
Malicorp Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/18. ICSID Secretary-General. Rejection of the application for annulment by the Claimant. No. No.
Erhas and others v. Turkmenistan, UNCITRAL Claimants. In favor of the Government. No. No.
RECOFI SA v. Vietnam, UNCITRAL. Claimants. No jurisdiction. No. No.
Gardabani Holdings B.V. v. Georgia, SCC. Claimant. NA. No. No.
Case (comment) Appointed by Award Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
PJSC Inter RAO and Telasi JSC v. Georgia, SCC. Claimants. NA. No. No.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v. Paraguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29. Chairman of the ICSID Administrative Council. $ 39,025,950.86 No. No.
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/12. Claimant. No jurisdiction. No. No.
Spentex Netherlands, B.V. v. Uzbekistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/26. Claimants. In favor of the Government. No. No.
Eiser Infrastructure Limited and Energía Solar Luxembourg S.à r.l. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/36.
COMMENT:
  • Australia rejects the Achmea judgments of the CJEU.
Claimants. $140,757,760 (€ 128,000,000 without costs & interests) No. No.
Blusun S.A., Jean-Pierre Lecorcier and Michael Stein v. Italian Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/3. Claimants. In favor of the Government. No. No.
Baggerwerken Decloedt En Zoon NV v. Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/27. Claimants. In favor of the Claimant. No. No.
Tethyan Copper Company Pty Limited v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/1. Claimants. $ 4,087,000,000. No. Yes, but unsuccessful.
Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited (CUHL) v. India, PCA Case No. 2016-7. Claimants. Pending. No. No.
AS PNB Banka and others v. Latvia, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/47. Claimants. Pending. No. Yes, pending.
Rizzani de Eccher S.p.A., Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. and Trevi S.p.A. v. Kuwait, ICSID Case No. ARB/17/8. Claimants. Pending. No. No.
The Estate of Julio Miguel Orlandini-Agreda and Compañía Minera Orlandini Ltda. v. Bolivia, PCA Case No. 2018-39. Both parties. Pending. No. No.
Thomas Gosling; Property Partnerships Development Managers (UK) Limited; Property Partnerships Developments (Mauritius) Ltd; Property Partnerships Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd; TG Investments ltd; and Mauritius, ICSID case no. ARB/16/32
COMMENT:
  • Optional contractual control & status of investor.
Claimants. In favor of the Government. Yes. No.
City-State N.V., Praktyka Asset Management Company LLC, Crystal-Invest LLC and Prodiz LLC v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/9 Claimant $8,910,490 No No
Case (comments) Appointed by Award (without costs & interests) Dissent Proposal to Disqualify
OOO Manolium Processing v. Republic of Belarus, PCA Case No. 2018-06 Claimant represented by Grant Hanessian, Vladimir Khvalei, Sergei Voitishkin, Alexandra Shmarko (BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP) Pending No No
ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (United Kingdom) v. The Republic of Argentina, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2010-9.
RELATED COMMENT:
  • Most-Favored Nation principle does not include BITs.
Investor represented by Christopher Colbridg, Mr. Benjamin Sanderson of Kirkland & Ellis International LLP No jurisdiction No Yes, successful due to his other proceedings against Argentina