Landau, Toby
This page provides data on individual adjudicative policy of the arbitrator.
| Case (comments) | Appointed by | Award (without costs & interests) | Dissent | Proposal to Disqualify |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WA Investments-Europea Nova Ltd (CY) v Czech Republic, PCA 2014-19. COMMENT: |
Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Voltaic Networks GMBH (Germany) v Czech Republic, PCA 2014-20. COMMENT: |
Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Photovoltaic Knopf Betriebs-GMBH (Germany) v v Czech Republic, PCA 2014-21. COMMENT: |
Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| ICW Europe Investments (UK) v Czech Republic, PCA 2014-22. COMMENT: |
Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Staur Eiendom AS, EBO Invest AS and Rox Holding AS v. Republic of Latvia, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/38. COMMENT:
|
Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Vladislav Kim and others v. Republic of Uzbekistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/6 | Government | Pending | No | No |
| Cambodia Power Company v. Kingdom of Cambodia, ICSID Case No. ARB/09/18 | Government | NA | No | No |
| Hussain Sajwani, Damac Park Avenue for Real Estate Development S.A.E., and Damac Gamsha Bay for Development S.A.E. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/16 | Government | Settlement | No | No |
| Lieven J. van Riet, Chantal C. van Riet and Christopher van Riet v. Republic of Croatia, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/12 | Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Tenaris S.A. and Talta - Trading e Marketing Sociedade Unipessoal Lda. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/26 | Government | $87,300,000 | no | No |
| Dan Cake S.A. v. Hungary, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/9 | Government | In favor of Investor, but under pending revision | No | No |
| Slovak Gas Holding BV, GDF International SAS and E.ON Ruhrgas International GmbH v. Slovak Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/12/7 | Both parties | Settlement | No | No |
| Mesa Power Group, LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-17 | Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Renta 4 S.V.S.A, Ahorro Corporación Emergentes F.I., Ahorro Corporación Eurofondo F.I., Rovime Inversiones SICAV S.A., Quasar de Valors SICAV S.A., Orgor de Valores SICAV S.A., GBI 9000 SICAV S.A. v. The Russian Federation, SCC No. 24/2007 | Government | $2,026,480 | No | No |
| Case (comments) | Appointed by | Award (without costs & interests) | Dissent | Proposal to Disqualify |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Renco Group, Inc. v. Republic of Peru [I], ICSID Case No. UNCT/13/1 | Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| Impregilo S.p.A. v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/3 | Government | Discontinuance | No | No |
| Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v. Republic of Ghana, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/24 | Government | In favor of State | No | No |
| GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/16 | Claimant | In favor of State | No | No |
| Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22 | Government | Breaches, but no compensation | No | No |
| Apotex Inc. v. The Government of the United States of America, ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/2 | Both parties | No jurisdiction | No | No |